I think Wikipedia is just the jumping off point for learning about a topic. The whole point is that you have a standard process to cite things and you can always track where the information comes from. You can always go another level deep and follow the sources. If those sources need updated with conflicting information, there is a process you can follow to do that. I don't think this video. Wikipedia is fine for broad overviews on topics and even diving deep into many areas but by design that material has to come from somewhere reliable (another potential pitfall of Wikipedia). 537K subscribers in the wikipedia community. A place to share interesting Wikipedia articles, and talk about Wikipedia and its sister projects Library Genesis (LibGen) is the largest free library in history: giving the world free access to 84 million scholarly journal articles, 6.6 million academic and general-interest books, 2.2 million comics, and 381 thousand magazines. /r/libgen and its moderators are not directly affiliated with Library Genesis. No book requests. Wikipedians is a subreddit created for discussion amongst Wikipedia contributors If you want to help out, you can translate this article to more languages, so that we can safely link to Anna's Archive in other languages. A subreddit to help you keep up to date with what's going on with reddit and other stuff. A place to share interesting Wikipedia articles, and talk about Wikipedia and its sister projects 36K votes, 15K comments. 45M subscribers in the AskReddit community. r/AskReddit is the place to ask and answer thought-provoking questions. Welcome to r/foodstamps The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP-- known informally as food stamps ) is a complicated program and can be difficult to make sense of. This subreddit exists for applicants/recipients to get answers to food stamp related questions, and for program experts to share information. Please note that this is NOT a place to complain about entitlement programs.